Re: What are the advantages of not being able to access multiple databases with one connection?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What are the advantages of not being able to access multiple databases with one connection? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYo8gpX8Q101zOOKMg3gnQyzhpheX_cd-Hxy2fvqk5gZw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | What are the advantages of not being able to access multiple databases with one connection? (crocket <crockabiscuit@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What are the advantages of not being able to access
multiple databases with one connection?
Re: What are the advantages of not being able to access multiple databases with one connection? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:37 AM, crocket <crockabiscuit@gmail.com> wrote: > MySQL permits a connection to access multiple databases. > But Postgresql restricts a connection to one database. > I think postgresql database connection is somewhat limited. > > Is it an old and decrepit design? or does it deserve some appreciations? I think it deserves some appreciation. Each database is completely isolated in terms of privileges, which is sometimes useful. Also, if you somehow manage to fry the system catalogs in one database, the other ones can still survive. The role played by databases in MySQL is served by schemas in PostgreSQL, so I don't see that there is a functional gap here. I am not sure I'd bother implementing the multi-database concept today if we didn't have it already ... but it seems kind of pointless to rip it out given that it's already there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: