Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYnZUeHenALQZ+iJMcVvsS_A0VpzkGz3hOL=ZMX1FkykQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:48:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it> wrote: >> > I've attached a new version of the patch fixing the missing closedir on >> > readdir error. >> >> If readir() fails and closedir() succeeds, the return will be -1 but >> errno will be 0. > > Out of curiosity, have you seen a closedir() implementation behave that way? > It would violate C99 ("The value of errno is zero at program startup, but is > never set to zero by any library function.") and POSIX. No. Good point, I didn't think about that. I think this way is safer, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: