Re: Small doc patch for pg_replication_slots
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Small doc patch for pg_replication_slots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYmf7bA47br3H+nxyPe9Kk9FAD-J7pWFwWvGAdGB-+iWw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Small doc patch for pg_replication_slots (Thomas Reiss <thomas.reiss@dalibo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Small doc patch for pg_replication_slots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Thomas Reiss <thomas.reiss@dalibo.com> wrote: > You can find attached a small patch to fix the pg_replication_slots > documentation. The slot_type and plugin are not in the appropriate > order, slot_name and plugin have a wrong type and xmin appears two times. Without the patch, the description of catalog_xmin is: <entry>The <literal>xmin</literal>, or oldest transaction ID, that this slot forces to be retained in the systemcatalogs. </entry> With the patch it's: <entry>The oldest transaction that this slot needs the database to retain. <literal>VACUUM</literal> cannot removecatalog tuples deleted by any later transaction. That's only one word different from the language for xmin, which doesn't seem quite right. Committed after fixing that. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: