Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I think 0001 is better than the status quo, but I'm wondering whether
>> we should try to do something slightly different.  Maybe it should
>> always work for the child table to specify neither WITH OIDS nor
>> WITHOUT OIDS, but if you do specify one of them then it has to be the
>> one that matches the parent partitioned table?  With this patch, IIUC,
>> WITH OIDS is allowed only if the parent has the same, but WITHOUT OIDS
>> is allowed (but ignored) regardless of the parent setting.
>
> With the patch, one can always specify (or not) WITH/WITHOUT OIDS when
> creating partitions.  If WITH OIDS is specified and the parent doesn't
> have OIDs, then an error is raised.  Then just like with normal
> inheritance, WITHOUT OIDS specification for a partition will be
> *overridden* if the parent has OIDs.  By the way, CREATE TABLE page says
> this about inheritance and OIDS:
>
>       (If the new table inherits from any tables that have OIDs, then
>       <literal>OIDS=TRUE</> is forced even if the command says
>       <literal>OIDS=FALSE</>.
>
> Hopefully it's clear to someone reading "If the table inherits from any
> tables ..." that it also refers to creating partition of a partitioned table.

I rewrote this to be a bit more explicit and committed it.  I noticed
that there was some duplication here: the old text said both this:

A partition cannot have columns other than those inherited from the parent.

And also this just a little later in the same page:

A partition must have the same column names and types as the table of
which it is a partition.

The second wording seemed better, so I moved that statement a little
higher up and rejiggered the wording to be super-clear about OIDs.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company