Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYkR=NvixYwU32c2zWUjgXSu4vNXCafpLqG=ydLC4kC8Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:28 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > please, can you propose, some what you like? > > For my purpose I can imagine PRAGMA on function level with same syntax like PL/SQL - I need to push somewhere some informationthat I can use for plpgsql_check to protect users against false alarms. The locality in this moment is not tooimportant for me. But I prefer solution that doesn't looks too strange, and is possible just with change plpgsql parser. Well, I haven't really studied this, but I would assume a statement-level pragma would look like an annotation of some kind on that particular statement, e.g. PRAGMA plpgsql_check (magic pavel stuff goes here) SELECT ... Rather than a separate statement: PRAGMA plpgsql_check (magic pavel stuff goes here); SELECT ... This might be the wrong idea, I'm not an expert on this or anything. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: