Re: FPW stats?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FPW stats? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYk3G7LUu0wW7FW-4uiPnSpqpKqTL_nPCk_h=yv7Ky4Kg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FPW stats? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Your patch adds a new field to PgStat_StatDBEntry? Wouldn't you > increase the bottleneck of deployments with many databases? What's > actually your use case? I'm a little doubtful about whether this particular thing is generally useful but I think the bar for adding a field to PgStat_StatDBEntry is probably a lot lower than for a per-table counter. I think adding table-level counters is basically not happening without some kind of rework of the infrastructure; whereas adding db-level counters seems like it might be OK if we were convinced that they had real value. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: