Re: pgbench doc fix
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench doc fix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYjzB9zkVBYaNWpigfyvUOYnPf745tRDvo==HUCdq-BCA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench doc fix (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench doc fix
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:48 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > Yes, you need to send params (thus send bind message) anyway. > Regarding re-parsing, maybe you mixed up parse-analythis with > planning? Re-parse-analythis can only be avoided if you can reuse > named (or unnamed) parepared statements. So given this, I'm struggling to see anything wrong with the current wording. I mean, if you say that you are reusing prepared statements, someone will assume that you are avoiding preparing them repeatedly, which -M extended will not do ... and by the nature of that approach, cannot do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: