Re: FlexLocks
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FlexLocks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYjBS3xotBuZ+GTxfTpnNLT7c2Gyx6=vS9xN11BxEdvZw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FlexLocks ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > >> As Kevin says nearby it's likely that we could find some way to >> rewrite the SLRU (clog and such) locking protocol using these new >> things too. > > Yeah, I really meant all SLRU, not just clog. And having seen what > Robert has done here, I'm kinda glad I haven't gotten around to > trying to reduce LW lock contention yet, even though we're getting > dangerously far into the release cycle -- I think it can be done > much better with the, er, flexibility offered by the FlexLock patch. I've had a thought that the SLRU machinery could benefit from having the concept of a "pin", which it currently doesn't. I'm not certain whether that thought is correct. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: