Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged;?
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged;? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoYjAEE+NtBQobrW3aruTxB7ONmdM+HSEdYKmO69iTJksw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged;? (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM
unpackaged;?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> Fujii noticed that I'd used >> \echo Use "CREATE EXTENSION pg_buffercache" to load this file. \quit >> in an extension upgrade script. That's obviously wrong, because it >> should say ALTER EXTENSION. The reason it's that way is that I copied >> the line from the unpackaged--1.0.sql file. >> I noticed all unpackaged--$version transition files miss the "FROM >> unpackaged" in that echo. >> I guess that's just a oversight which we should correct? > > Maybe for user-friendness. But I think that's not so important fix enough > to backpatch. Seems like a clear mistake to me. +1 for fixing it and back-patching. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: