Re: pg_rewarm status
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_rewarm status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYj651SSe9vHs0r_X_8xVF8M0GDtsvkptSmsBNNhNJuHQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_rewarm status (Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewarm status
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff@yahoo.com> wrote: > Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up. > (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com) Well, the patch was rejected, more or less because people felt it overlapped with pgfincore too much. I don't particularly agree, because pgfincore can't load data into shared buffers and doesn't work on Windows, but other people felt differently. There was talk of polishing up pgfincore for possible inclusion in contrib, perhaps adding this functionality along the way, but AFAIK there's been no activity on that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: