Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYioU+E7cfu+yDUy=W3wOZhqce4kH_Az6VKfPB9S_+Qiw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Right, but they provide same functionality as symlinks and now we >> are even planing to provide this feature for both linux and windows as >> both Tom and Robert seems to feel, it's better that way. Anyhow, >> I think naming any entity generally differs based on individual's >> perspective, so we can go with the name which appeals to more people. >> In case, nobody else has any preference, I will change it to what both >> of us can agree upon (either 'tablespace catalog', 'tablespace_info' ...). > > Well, I have made my argument. Since you're the submitter, feel free to > select what you think is the best name. For what it's worth, I, too, dislike having symlink in the name. Maybe "tablespace_map"? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: