Re: Remaining beta blockers
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYgiT7i0EgqdjEFN=cjj=Yk2Zj32Si3guqvuaLaC7OfNA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remaining beta blockers (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remaining beta blockers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Kevin Grittner (kgrittn@ymail.com) wrote: >> If they modified the heap files that way while the server was >> running, the results would be somewhat unpredictable. If they did >> it while the server was stopped, starting the server and attempting >> to access the matview would generate: > > Right, the point being that they could (ab)use it as a flag to trigger > something to happen. I'd also be worried about failure cases where > files appear to be zero-length. If you assume that people are going to modify files while the backend is running, nothing we do anywhere is safe. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: