Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError()
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYgKzeOqvR5+JhzdWJYMU2CEXBySRcTogrvupxxJadjgA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError() (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2015/10/23 19:02, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2015/10/23 18:51, Etsuro Fujita wrote: >>> >>> This is really really nitpicking, but I noticed that there is an implicit >>> rule concerning the message format in ATWrongRelkindError; if more than >>> two objects are present, the message is "\"%s\" is not a foo, bar, or >>> baz". ("or" is preceded by a comma!) So, would it be better that the >>> former is "\"%s\" is not a table, view, or foreign table"? >> >> Oops! Yeah, I missed the comma there. That seems like a generally >> preferred punctuation rule (the comma before conjunction(s) I mean). > > Here is a patch rectifying that mistake. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: