Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYfxfFMjZB1amHEiGdL4KJb8Htj0fQWrRdxWL1bTg_G7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The system will let you set the "user_catalog_table" reloption to "true" > on a materialized view. Is this sensible, or is it a bug caused by the > fact that reloptions.c fails to distinguish matviews from heaps at all? > > If it is sensible, then I broke it in e3e66d8a9 ... I can understand what that combination of opens would mean from a semantic point of view, so I don't think it's insensible. However, it doesn't seem like an important combination to support, and I suspect that the fact that we did was accidental. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: