Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYeTytkZdSQqX8Ck+ZHSQkW5dyY8-0=rCdofxUbjdya_A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint
Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'd rather have a --quiet mode instead. If you're running it by hand, > you're likely to omit the switch, whereas when writing the cron job > you're going to notice lack of switch even before you let the job run > once. Well, that might've been a better way to design it, but changing it now would break backward compatibility and I'm not really sure that's a good idea. Even if it is, it's a separate concern from whether or not in the less-quiet mode we should point out that we're waiting for a checkpoint on the server side. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: