Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYbsLOVcVQDe38g73T3NKAM6fzY3FXP3HzM1dMdNi7qtw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: >> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.] >> >> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert, >> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open >> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a >> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on >> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this >> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may >> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed >> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your >> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > Discussion of this issue is still ongoing. Accordingly, I intend to > wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further. > I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update > by then. Although I have done a bit of review of this patch, it needs more thought than I have so far had time to give it. I will update again by Tuesday. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: