Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoYb_1vdJWTS_nx2FnpSdk6KOE+wjfVTt_JQQN4HkUb8Dw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > More people seem to have voted for the single file approach but I still > haven't understood why... Me neither. Having an include directory seems good, but I can't think why we'd want to clutter it up with a bajillion automatically generated files. One .auto file that gets overwritten at need seems way nicer. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: