Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYbZO0rM8ystcf-ZxWCEBAdJg1vjETpXu+m+a0uX_STLg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/19/16 2:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I suggest that we make it part of bgw_flags, but use a bitmask for it, >> like this: >> >> #define BGWORKER_CLASS_MASK 0x00f0 >> #define BGWORKER_CLASS_PARALLEL 0x0010 >> /* add additional bgworker classes here */ > > Unless we have a mechanism that makes use of this somehow, this attempt > at categorizing might be premature. My main reason for wanting is that I suspect there will be a similar desire to limit the number of replication workers at some point. However, that could be wrong. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: