Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYaeb6JL6DjOpHkAOXhOQyC9qoz5VVrU+4-1DNDG24PSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming
Replication and pg_upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> >> I am assuming that's a "yes" to both the directions: older -> newer , and >> >> newer -> older minor releases. >> > >> > Yes, I believe both directions would work unless we mentioned it the >> > release notes, in which cases it might not work, or might work older to >> > newer but newer to older. >> >> I don't see how this would get broken in a minor release. We'd have >> to change the WAL format or the tuple format, which is definitely not >> minor release material. > > If there was a bug in the xlog stream content we might not be able to > fix it without breaking compatibility. Rare, but possible. OK, fair enough. But I think the likelihood is extremely low. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: