Re: 9.5 release notes
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYaMX9xU=wNdRi8UB=mJFU7zKNrUBFLGSauMxVSVLvqZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.5 release notes (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.5 release notes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> <listitem> >>> <para> >>> Improve concurrent locking and buffer scan performance (Andres >>> Freund, Kevin Grittner) >>> </para> >>> </listitem> >> >> If this is ab5194e6f, I don't think it makes sense to mention "buffer >> scan" - it's just any lwlock, and buffer locks aren't the primary >> benefit (ProcArrayLock, buffer mapping lock probably are that). I also > >> don't think Kevin was involved? > > It seems likely that 2ed5b87f9 was combined with something else in > this reference. By reducing buffer pins and buffer content locking > during btree index scans it shows a slight performance gain in > btree scans and avoids some blocking of btree index vacuuming. I think maybe we should separate that back out. The list needs to be user-accessible, but if it's hard to understand what it's referring to, that's not good either. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: