Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYaDwtvgTcJXEwpbwAnrwYv6Gq00A=ZKjEOjMKe=GT9bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication (Christian Kruse <christian@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication
Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> It feels weird to me that the new columns are called transactionid and >> xmin. Why not xid and xmin? > > Actually the part of that that bothers me is "xmin", which conflicts > with a reserved system column name. While you can legally pick such > conflicting names for view columns, it's not going to be so much fun > when you try to join that view against some regular table. That's a fair point, too. So maybe we should go with something like backend_xid and backend_xmin or some other prefix that we come up with. My concern is more that I think they should be consistent somehow. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: