Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY_FGLuCQA7PK5fqqPL7xReRStbQvGMw_BWJbHYpWEtTw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam() (Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya.himanshu@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 10:19 AM Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya.himanshu@gmail.com> wrote: > I was trying to use lp_valid as I need to identify the root of the HOT chain and we are doing validation on the root ofthe HOT chain when we loop over the predecessor array. > Was resetting lp_valid in the last patch because we don't add data to predecessor[] and while looping over the predecessorarray we need to isolate (and identify) all cases of missing data in the predecessor array to exactly identifythe root of HOT chain. > One solution is to always add data to predecessor array while looping over successor array and then while looping overpredecessor array we can continue for other validation "if (lp_valid [predecessor[currentoffnum]] && lp_valid[currentoffnum]"is true but in this case also our third loop will also look at lp_valid[]. I don't mind if the third loop looks at lp_valid if it has a reason to do that, but I don't think we should be resetting values from true to false. Once we know a line pointer to be valid, it doesn't stop being valid later because we found out some other thing about something else. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: