Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYZqbH4raR9p22Se8SCQCi5zJOH8Fpwuki0=AFy6Ddvpw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand (Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we >> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default >> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do. Yeah, that would be an incompatible >> change, but that's what major releases are for no? > > After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea. Hmm, my experience is different. I use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE) a lot, but EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) only rarely. I wonder if a GUC is the way to go. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: