Re: Online enabling of checksums
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYYD5P-Gbay3tDWD6SvQj0DT6z0+-B3GiAtfdbRuW9v1g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online enabling of checksums (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online enabling of checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > I've commented weeks ago about my doubts, and Robert concurred: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZPRfMqZoK_Fbo_tD9OH9PdPFcPBsi-sdGZ6Jg8OMM2PA%40mail.gmail.com Yes, and I expressed some previous reservations as well. Granted, my reservations about this patch are less than for MERGE, and granted, too, what is Magnus supposed to do about a couple of committers expressing doubts about whether something really ought to be committed? Is that an absolute bar? It wasn't phrased as such, nor do we really have the authority. At the same time, those concerns didn't generate much discussion and, at least in my case, are not withdrawn merely because time has passed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: