Re: Expose options to explain? (track_io_timing)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Expose options to explain? (track_io_timing) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYXT1Za5+U4StLGNGcTwtX_c7LxvTNA-e6Q0FcR+PF+3g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Expose options to explain? (track_io_timing) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On 10/14/2014 10:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Hmm. IIRC, there are only two use cases for I/O timing at present: >> pg_stat_statements (which really only makes sense if it's turned on or >> off system-wide) and EXPLAIN. Rather than inventing more GUC >> machinery, I think we could just add an explain flag called "IO". So >> you could do: >> >> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, IO) SELECT .... >> >> And that would gather I/O stats even if it's turned off system-wide. >> Or you could do: >> >> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, IO false) SELECT .... >> >> That can't really be allowed to suppress gathering the I/O stats for >> this query if the sysadmin wants those stats for all queries. But it >> could suppress the print-out. > > I think the first one makes the most sense. It would be both or neither, not one or the other. All EXPLAIN options take true/false arguments; but "true" can be omitted for brevity. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: