Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYXJWF3XdPZas873SkpKJWxa=3XLN0MKPEUp79e-7sDVw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Not enough. This feature is clearly being suggested as a way to offer > Postgres in embedded mode for users by a back door. Doing that forces > us to turn off many of the server's features and we will take a huge > step backwards in features, testing, maintainability of code and > wasted community time. That's not clear to me at all. IIRC, the original idea was Tom's, and the idea is to make it possible to have, for example, a psql session connected to a standalone database, which can't be done right now. I don't use standalone mode much, but when I do, I'd sure like to have the psql interface rather than the existing standalone mode interface.I'm not aware that there's anything in this patch whichtargets any other use case; if there is, sure, rip it out. But let's not assume this is going in a bad direction, especially considering who it was that suggested the idea originally. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: