Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
> However, it is a little bit difficult to follow the dependencies between
> different partition patches, so I may not always provide sane feedback, as
> seen in [1].
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/579077fd-8f07-aff7-39bc-b92c855cdb70%40redhat.com

Yeah, no issues.  I knew about the dependency between those patches,
but I'm pretty sure there wasn't any terribly explicit discussion
about it, even if the issue probably came up parenthetically someplace
or other.  Oops.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers