Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> I marked this patch as ready for committer.

The patch says:

If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>,
there is currently no way for incoming notifications to be received.

But wouldn't it be more correct to say:

If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, the
worker will log those notifications, but there is no programmatic way
for the worker to intercept and respond to those notifications.

Or something like that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company