Re: cannot move relocatable extension out of pg_catalog schema
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cannot move relocatable extension out of pg_catalog schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYVA+_Vuj0hCHGc2R3weLTsVcsCQHBrUzX=FeamVisYxw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cannot move relocatable extension out of pg_catalog schema (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: cannot move relocatable extension out of pg_catalog
schema
Re: cannot move relocatable extension out of pg_catalog schema |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> I wonder whether it'd not be a better idea to forbid specifying >> pg_catalog as the target schema for relocatable extensions. > > But that would be important, I think. I understand the temptation to forbid pg_catalog as the target schema for relocatable extensions, or indeed for object creation in general. The fact that you can't, for example, go back and drop the objects later is a real downer. On the other hand, from a user perspective, it's really tempting to want to create certain extensions (adminpack, for example) in such a way that they appear to be "part of the system" rather than something that lives in a user schema. Had we some other solution to that problem (a second schema that behaves like pg_catalog but is empty by default and allows drops?) we might alleviate the need to put stuff in pg_catalog per se. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: