Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYTyGqrusrQGZ6fzjO3zj0hFibhuarvNcsYNvgg77ao1A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > master q01 min: 14146.498 dev min: 11479.05 [diff -23.24] dev-jit min: 8659.961 [diff -63.36] dev-jit-deformmin: 7279.395 [diff -94.34] dev-jit-deform-inline min: 6997.956 [diff -102.15] I think this is a really strange way to display this information. Instead of computing the percentage of time that you saved, you've computed the negative of the percentage that you would have lost if the patch were already committed and you reverted it. That's just confusing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: