Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYTv39xe_KG-XzqMV5XuAyjX23ZUWWifBzkSLDDOmvYJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:54 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:43 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > >> We are certainly not supposed to go DROP SCHEMA on the temp namespaces, ... > > > Actually, I think that's supposed to work. > > If it's in active use by any session (including your own), that's not going > to have nice consequences; the owning session will have the OID in > static storage, and it will be unhappy when that OID becomes dangling. Maybe that's something we should fix? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: