Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11805: Missing SetServiceStatus call during service shutdown in pg_ctl (Windows only)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11805: Missing SetServiceStatus call during service shutdown in pg_ctl (Windows only) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYTXywGXFngXXVtma9dY_KoiV2mzDgskb6oN7kOCDnBfQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11805: Missing SetServiceStatus call during service shutdown in pg_ctl (Windows only) (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11805: Missing SetServiceStatus call
during service shutdown in pg_ctl (Windows only)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:02:41AM +0000, krystian.bigaj@gmail.com wrote: >>> The following bug has been logged on the website: >>> >>> Bug reference: 11805 >>> Logged by: Krystian Bigaj >>> Email address: krystian.bigaj@gmail.com >>> PostgreSQL version: 9.3.5 >>> Operating system: Windows 7 Pro x64 >>> Description: >>> >>> pg_ctl on Windows during service start/shutdown should notify service >>> manager about it's status by increment dwCheckPoint and call to >>> SetServiceStatus/pgwin32_SetServiceStatus. >>> >>> However during shutdown there is a missing call to SetServiceStatus. >>> See src\bin\pg_ctl\pg_ctl.c: >> >> [ thread moved to hackers ] >> >> Can a Windows person look into this issue? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20141028070241.2593.58180@wrigleys.postgresql.org >> >> The thread includes a patch. I need a second person to verify its >> validity. Thanks. > > FWIW, it looks sane to me to do so, ServiceMain declaration is in > charge to start the service, and to wait for the postmaster to stop, > and indeed process may increment dwcheckpoint in -w mode, and it > expects for process to wait for 12 times but this promise is broken. > The extra calls to SetServiceStatus are also welcome to let the SCM > know the current status in more details. So, what's next here? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: