Re: [HACKERS] Guarding against bugs-of-omission in initdb's setup_depend

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> While thinking about something else, it started to bother me that
> initdb's setup_depend() function knows exactly which catalogs might
> contain pinnable objects.  It is not very hard to imagine that somebody
> might add a DATA() line to, say, pg_transform.h and expect that the
> represented object could not get dropped.  Well, tain't so, because
> setup_depend() doesn't collect OIDs from there.
>
> So I'm thinking about adding a regression test case, say in dependency.sql,
> that looks for unpinned objects with OIDs in the hand-assigned range,
> along the lines of this prototype code:

I don't have specific thoughts, but I like the general idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company