On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 1:51 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:44:58AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 7:29 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >> > Replacing that with a six-element integer array would be a clear improvement
> >> > and, IMHO, better than adding yet another function to the extension.
> >>
> >> I'd have no issue with that.
> >
> > Cool.
>
> The six-element array approach won't show the number of dirty and pinned
> buffers for each usage count, but I'm not sure that's a deal-breaker.
> Barring objections, I'll post an updated patch shortly with that approach.
Right, well, I would personally be OK with 6 rows too, but I don't
know what other people want. I think either this or that is better
than average.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com