Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYR4TsEGbeKqX0eZU13LMe3Abtq+TM0bLyUMNXcixmq3Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:40 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On Thursday 22 October 2015 13:25:52 you wrote: >> It would be more useful, if we're going to autogenerate code, > Are we going to use autogenerate code? I thought that's what you were proposing. Process the struct definitions and emit .c files. >> to do it from the actual struct definitions. > I can gen xml/json from actual struct. I offered XML/JSON as the analysis of C > code much more difficult. But my current generator just use the structure from > the header files (by pycparser). Anything that is part of the build process will have to be done in C or Perl. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: