Re: enhanced error fields
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: enhanced error fields |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYQiwLXbh+E+0-NU6BKx8fkvG_-_3LwoSmBgHaA_iP1hw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: enhanced error fields (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: enhanced error fields
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Ascertaining the identity of the object in question perfectly > unambiguously, so that you can safely do something like lookup a > comment on the object, seems like something way beyond what I'd > envisioned for this feature. Why should the comment be useful in an > error handler anyway? At best, that seems like a nice-to-have extra to > me. The vast majority are not even going to think about the ambiguity > that may exist. They'll just write: > > if (constraint_name == "upc") > MessageBox("That is not a valid barcode."); The people who are content to do that don't need this patch at all. They can just apply a regexp to the message that comes back from the server and then set constraint_name based on what pops out of the regex. And then do just what you did there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: