Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYQN00XB9HJnGNPx7HtSi9f9anTakXxJxK9Wgq_5Y1F2Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Obsolete comment in tidpath.c (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > I think "best_inner_indexscan()" in the following comment in tidpath.c > is obsolete. > > * There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in > * particular nothing corresponding to best_inner_indexscan(). Since it's > * not very useful to store TIDs of one table in another table, there > * doesn't seem to be enough use-case to justify adding a lot of code > * for that. > > How about s/best_inner_indexscan()/parameterized scans/? I'm not sure that's altogether clear. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: