Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYQAn6PdSQjPaiowZd+MxHT4PRG4Ny1iYLNAqLkg0KKSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:54 PM Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Error in the COPY or in the DDL? COPY preferred. Somebody with insert rights shouldn't be able to prevent a table-ownerlevel action. People normally drop partitions to save space, so it could be annoying if that was interrupted. Yeah, the COPY. > Supporting parallel query shouldn't make other cases more difficult from a behavioral perspective just to avoid the ERROR.The ERROR sounds annoying, but not sure how annoying avoiding it would be. In my view, it's not just a question of it being annoying, but of whether anything else is even sensible. I mean, you can avoid an error when a user types SELECT 1/0 by returning NULL or 42, but that's not usually how we roll around here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: