Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYPkp8pXyvgKfbHdk7Qy=wsOPKvcz76WEcoOCqTeBjzgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > This is all very environment specific. Changes to postgresql.conf, in > many environments, go through a serious of tests before being deployed > by a CM system. How do we accomplish the same kind of tests before > deploying a change with ALTER SYSTEM? We provide no mechanism to do > that today. We provide no mechanism to put the changes to put postgresql.conf changes through a series of tests before being deployed by a CM system, either. But you can do that if you want. Two different methods of restricting ALTER SYSTEM have already been discussed on this thread: one using file permissions, and the other using ProcessUtility_hook. I personally think that's good enough. It's true that you could have a separate GUC for it, but then somebody could lock themselves out by turning the GUC on using ALTER SYSTEM, so now you've made things easier for one group of users while creating a new pitfall for another group of users. I'm not sure we really come out ahead, there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: