Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYK3Ntsaw4LFqApBsA1dKxvWwgZkWNVSoZgAg4H8gpVBg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control (Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:06 PM Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote: > Not sure what to do about this, but as people/companies start moving to > 15, I am afraid we will get people complaining about this. I think > having exclusive mode still be the default for pg_start_backup() (albeit > deprecated) in one release and then dropping it in the next was too > fast. I completely agree, and I said so at the time, but got shouted down. I think the argument that exclusive backups were breaking anything at all was very weak. Nobody was being forced to use them, and they broke nothing for people who didn't. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: