Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYH5gnTq6Qsx1qWmKqa3A7OFt5S_BSQ6BxDQazLVLnb4A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Whether the voters recognized that fact at the time I would have to concur >> that if we are going to change from xlog to wal we should be all-in. If >> you want to vote to reject putting the whole camel in the tent I would say >> its a vote for reverting the change that put the camel's nose in there in >> the first place. > > WTF. I think that response is unwarranted. I happen to agree entirely with his position. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: