Re: Make HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC more concurrent
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Make HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC more concurrent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYGmD=noytwxuxuXYcaRNgEvsuJkAutKYBeLeSJbwEKeg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Make HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC more concurrent (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Make HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC more concurrent
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I think one case where the patch can impact is for aborted transactions. > In TransactionIdIsInProgress(), we check for aborted transactions before > consulting pg_subtrans whereas with patch it will consult pg_subtrans > without aborted transaction check. Now it could be better to first check > pg_subtrans if we found that the corresponding top transaction is > in-progress as that will save extra pg_clog lookup, but I just mentioned > because that is one difference that I could see with this patch. > > Another minor point is, I think we should modify function level comment > for XidInMVCCSnapshot() where it says that this applies to known- > committed XIDs which will no longer be true after this patch. But only if the snapshot has overflowed, right? That should affect only a small minority of cases. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: