Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYGjydAva6Knr7LHEijRPw+-Vy5ceBDsELAHXwPQ18JUA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> P.S. While I haven't reviewed 0002 in detail, I think the concept of >> minimizing what needs to be built in RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo >> is a very good idea. > > I put this patch ahead in the list and so it's now 0001. I think what you've currently got as 0003-Relieve-RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo-of-doing-an.patch is a bug fix that probably needs to be back-patched into v10, so it should come first. I think 0002-Teach-pg_inherits.c-a-bit-about-partitioning.patch and 0005-Store-in-pg_inherits-if-a-child-is-a-partitioned-tab.patch should be merged into one patch and that should come next, followed by 0004-Teach-expand_inherited_rtentry-to-use-partition-boun.patch and finally what you now have as 0001-Decouple-RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo-from-execu.patch. This patch series is blocking a bunch of other things, so it would be nice if you could press forward with this quickly. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: