Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYGQ=MG94iuTM+hfK5XyiZLCQDvm1n7gPD3AHLJs3AsyQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0 (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Maybe. It depends on how valuable it's to keep Gather and GatherMerge > similar - having nreaders in one and not the other seems a bit weird. But > maybe the refactoring would remove it from both nodes? Yeah, it appears to be the case that both Gather and GatherMerge inevitably end up with nworkers_launched == nreaders, which seems dumb. If we're going to clean this up, I think we should make them both match. > Also, it does not really solve the issue that we're using 'nreaders' or > 'nworkers_launched' to access array with one extra element. I'm not clear that there's any fundamental solution to that problem other than trying to clarify it through comments. Meantime, I think it's not good to leave this crashing, so I pushed Rushabh's v2 patch for the actual crash for now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: