Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYFwF9fPoj+iVNYKBUuqf66Duio_cNtB7qrgSJwxdixCw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> It disallowed it only for tables, and not for any other object type. >> I found that completely arbitrary. It's perfectly obvious that people >> want to be able to create objects in pg_catalog; shall we adopt a rule >> that you can put extension there, as long as those extensions don't >> happen to contain tables? That is certainly confusing and arbitrary. > > Why don't we just prohibit deletion/modification for anything below > FirstNormalObjectId instead of using the schema as a restriction? Then > we can allow creation for tables as well. We currently do, but that led to problems with $SUBJECT. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: