Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYEY0SnGSVik5gm9r+T6kFOTg3vwMCq3EGVyY4HwgjP-A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > If I'm following correctly, Peter's specifically talking about: > > [ USING ( <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> ) ] > [ WITH CHECK ( <replaceable class="parameter">check_expression</replaceable> ) ] > > Where the USING parameter is 'expression' but the WITH CHECK parameter > is 'check_expression'. He makes a good point, I believe, as > "expression" is overly generic. I don't like the idea of using > "barrier_expression" though as that ends up introducing a new term- how > about "using_expression"? Oh. Well, I guess we could change that. I don't think it's a problem, myself. I thought he was talking about something in the SGML markup. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: