Re: Reviewing freeze map code
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYE6wCKpoxnoJfqizpi-zTYHvjgN0YWR-hPzbZDWR_m6w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reviewing freeze map code ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reviewing freeze map code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> It's not a bad thought, but I do think it might be a bit confusing. >> My main priority for this new option is that people aren't tempted to >> use it very often, and I think a name like "even_frozen_pages" is more >> likely to accomplish that than just "frozen". > > freeze_all_pages? No, that's what the existing FREEZE option does. This new option is about unnecessarily vacuuming pages that don't need it. The expectation is that vacuuming all-frozen pages will be a no-op. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: