Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYDj8g8zKRgjU1SoGZ0T2BZx9iHJY=OFVag+7RmNp6Wbw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good >> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong. > > It doesn't appear in the documentation. The term "inference > specification" only appears where it's necessary to precisely describe > the input to unique index inference. Well, we can change this to say "inference specification", but I still think calling it the "ON CONFLICT" clause would be clearer in this context. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: