On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 10:39 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Using fake LSNs isn't new.. how is this not a concern already then?
>
> Also wondering why the buffer manager would care about the LSN on pages
> which are not BM_PERMANENT..?
>
> I'll admit that I might certainly be missing something here.
Oh, FlushBuffer has a guard against this case in it. I hadn't realized that.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com