Re: beta3?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYBW-atpRiAueigUpbK07WReFJUN73_jOi3U=xZ_8ODmA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta3? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta3?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> That sounds reasonable to me. I'll be on vacation then, but (1) I'm >> not really involved in pushing the release out the door and (2) I >> should have Internet access if push comes to shove. > > We seem to still have some blockers ... I'm only seeing these two: * ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe * btree_gist breaks some behaviors involving <> operators Simon fixed the first over the weekend (though I think there are a few loose ends, see separate email on that topic) and Tom proposed a fix for the second (which I am guessing he will implement). Any other reason we can't or shouldn't wrap on the 11th? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: